PolytoolhubEditorial Policy
Polytoolhub organizes Polymarket tools around the tasks they support: trading, research and development. Our aim is to make the options and their differences easier to understand.
How we review product claims
We prioritize provider websites, documentation and repositories. A documentation review does not establish that a product works as described; actual testing is identified separately. Unknown prices remain unknown, and historical services are labeled accordingly.
Selection and order
Categories reflect documented functions rather than product names alone. The catalog defaults to Highest rated, with unrated profiles after rated profiles and ties resolved by name, then profile ID. Editorial scores have a written rationale and remain separate from published user reviews. At five user reviews the primary score becomes their average. Readers can also sort alphabetically. Scores do not predict returns or certify security. The homepage Editor’s picks are a separate selection for different tasks. Recently added uses the date a profile first entered the published catalog, not the date a product launched or a source was rechecked.
Commercial relationships
Polytoolhub and PolyTradingBot are projects of the same team. Per-product ownership, sponsorship and affiliate relationships are recorded in the relevant profile. An unconfirmed relationship is not a statement that no relationship exists.
Corrections
Email info@polytradingbot.com with the listing URL, the affected claim and a primary source. We review proposed changes before editing a profile. A claim to represent a product requires supporting evidence and does not automatically grant control of a listing.
Editorial tools
The research and writing process uses software and AI assistance. AI-generated text is checked against provider documentation; it does not constitute a product test. The team is responsible for maintaining published content.